იურისდიქციის ფარგლები ევროპული სამართლის მიხედვით

Scientists of law and practical lawyers have not yet developed the unified opinion about ups and downs of various legal systems co-existence. Againsrt background of transnational approaches, jurisprudence evidently surpassed inner national frontiers. The difference existing between continental and English-American system of jurisprudence has been gradually vanishing. The English-American system of jurisprudence is not a pure precedent law system any more. On the other hand, judges of the continental Europe apply prejudices often. At present “cohabitation” of the legal systems is common. Legal pluralism is also frequent when various legal systems are aggregated within limits of a single jurisprudence. Historial and cultural origins of any country, political and social factors are sometimes of decisive importance for development of law. In this aspect Georgia is not exception, too. Harmonization of law has never been unusual for Georgia. Various legal flows on some or another stages of development influenced greatly upon a modern Georgian law eventually. The Western orbit chosen by our state presented new challenges to Georgian legal proceedings at our contemporaneity whereas agenda of its modernization is substantiated with relationships between Georgia and the European Union and alignment to European legal standards. “High Contractual Parties within limits of own jurisprudence ensure the rights and freedoms determined in clause I of this Convention”. The Convention “aims to protect specific and efficient rights, but not theoretical or illusive ones”.