საკონსტიტუციო სასამართლოს მოქმედების ფარგლები და მტკიცების ტვირთის განაწილება კონსტიტუციური წარდგინების განხილვისას

The present paper discusses scope of action regarding Constitutional Court and the distribution of the burden of proof when considering a constitutional submission. An important issue is the constitutional submission, the burden of proof and their legal analysis. The Constitutional Court ensures the protection of human rights and the rule of law. The paper discusses the essence, purpose, burden of proof and number of problems that procedurally accompany the constitutional submission. For the purpose of the study, the importance of submission to the Constitutional Court should be determined, where we will see the main purpose of the Constitutional Court, we are talking about the control of the constitutionality of the normative content of the norm. Analysis of constitutional case law allows us to define the rule of law and the function of the Constitutional Court in the administration of constitutional justice. In the paper, several important decisions are discussed, which show the problems and challenges in practice. The main task of the Constitutional Court is to ensure the independence of the judiciary and to increase public confidence in a fair trial. It is necessary to introduce the right practice and identify the main shortcomings that are clearly visible. It is important to consider the problematic issue that needs to be addressed to take appropriate action.