ირიბი ჩვენების გამოყენების წესი საერთაშორისო და ეროვნული კანონმდებლობით

Rule of application of indirect evidence is discussed in the present work according to international and national legislation. Hence, legislation and practice of Europe and countries of common law with national is discussed in this context.
Before making a broad review, to review in brief, the part of west European countries make concrete exceptions for admissibility of indirect evidence. American model includes wide exceptions; Canadian model is also wide, though in this case the fact is assessed by a judge.
The rules mandated by precedent law in Ireland and Britain are ambivalent, the balance is observed between discretion of judge and determining of concrete exceptions. Estonian model is the best appropriate to Georgian procedural law, where concrete exceptions are listed at legislative level.
Indirect evidence, in general is less reliable evidence, its application includes risk of wrong perception regarding to guilt of person and thus may only be permitted in exceptive cases, under providence of constitutional guarantees and statutory rule.
Hence, the main point and significance of indirect evidence will be underlined in below given chapters.
The work includes annotation, table of contents, introduction, the main topic (that is divided into chapters and sub chapters), conclusion and list of used literature.