მტკიცებულებათა დასაშვებობა სისხლის სამართლის კანონმდებლობაში

Firstly, I want to mention that, The master's thesis presented by me is related to the admissibility of evidence in criminal law.
I will talk about the evidence in general and their role in the criminal proceedings. At first initially, I will look at the stages of evidence, where I look at the stages of the prosecution in the new legislation, compared to the old legislation.
I consider the process of evidences, which means to convince itself of the evidence that is called evidence. As for the admissibility of the evidence, it is the main axis in the proceedings and the evidence plays a decisive role in solving the fate of the accused.
The paper also gives considerable attention to the entitled authority to obtain evidence because if evidence is obtained by an unauthorized person, the evidence must be inadmissible by the Court.
The subsequent chapters are focused on issues such as the acts under Article 112 of the Criminal legislation procedure, the admissibility of evidence obtained by the hidden investigative actions, investigative actions conducted without the participation of the accused. In each case the details of the circumstances and the expectation are detailed the results can be followed by the implementation of these actions.
My Master's Theory is also one of the legal theories, such as the "poisonous tree fruit", which means the category of evidence that has been obtained for illegal investigative actions. I have the example of two countries, examples of American states and UK , The question of admissibility of evidence relatively.
At the end of the work there is also the conclusion and the literature used.