სამართლიანი პროცესი და სწრაფი მართლმსაჯულება, როგორც საპროცესო შეთანხმების საფუძველი

Let’s begin by saying, that this is an all-encompassing, deep and quite general matter. Due to this complexity the aim of the present work is not a thorough analysis of fair trial and swift justice.
Georgia is a country of an immense past and experience, which constantly underwent and is undergoing certain reforms till this day. Considering today’s reality, the given work addresses one of important and relevant subjects of procedural law of Georgia, a procedural agreement, which is a matter of persistent criticism and dispute in society and field of law. More specifically, the work discusses to what extent the procedural agreement corresponds to principle of fair trial and swift justice, when it is in opposition to another legal principle.
Moreover, you will come upon an issue in the present work, which emerged during the pandemic in the world, particularly, I tried to display the threat the justice is facing, what changes became necessary and to what extent Georgia was ready to deal with this situation. The work discusses whether it is possible to implement procedural agreement by means of internet communications when the attempt of executing swift justice in modern criminal procedure has been detected; such novelty ensures saving time, energy and other means.
While compiling the given work, I met prosecutors as well as lawyers in a bid to find out their attitude and viewpoints regarding negotiating and implementing procedural agreement through internet communication sources, on the latter I heard opinions of acting judges.
On the whole, the goal has been achieved, the work to be discussed provides an opportunity to become familiar with procedural agreement, which is still a cause of criticism till this day despite the years since it emerged in procedural legislation and consider the possibility of negotiating/implementing procedural agreement through internet communication sources in future, which, to my mind, will be neither the first nor the last change in case of its execution.