სისხლისსამართლებრივი დევნის პროცესუალური ასპექტები წინა სასამართლო სხდომაზე

This paper discusses the procedural aspects of the prosecution of bloodshed in a previous court hearing. Therefore, in this context, the legislation and practice of European and common law countries are discussed together with the national one.
Before we move on to an extensive review, to briefly review the criminal prosecution in general, different countries are implementing practices and experiences tailored to their legislation. Prosecution does not have a precise definition, and scholars in various jurisprudence explain criminal prosecution in different ways in their writings, which we will discuss later. On the one hand, everyone agrees that criminal prosecution is being carried out between the state and the individual or the accused.
Given that we have two of the most common models of criminal justice in the world today, we will talk about the practices and experiences derived from common law, the same Anglo-American and continental Europe, the same Romanian-German, and then mainly from these two models. We will define the basics of initiating and ending a criminal prosecution, in this paper we will look at what views prominent scholars of law have and how they view criminal prosecution as the most important mechanism in combating crime. We will get acquainted with the criminal prosecution at the stage of the previous court session and the assessments of various Georgian and foreign sciences, what is the role, what is the workload of the pre-trial session.